FromDayOne, Inc's logo
STORIES
Live Conference Recap BY Carrie Snider | July 15, 2026

Reducing Change Fatigue and Building More Adaptable Teams

If the past few years have made anything clear, it’s that change is now a constant in business. That reality has left employees at every level grappling with change fatigue. How can leaders help their people adapt while reducing the toll of continual transformation?At From Day One’s Manhattan conference, leaders participated in a panel addressing practical approaches for leaders. Moderated by Tania Rahman, social media director at Fast Company, they discussed how organizations can move beyond reactive change management and instead build systems that help employees sustain performance through continuous disruption. Across the conversation, a clear theme emerged: change fatigue is not simply about the pace of transformation, but about how leaders communicate, support, and structure it.Reframing Fatigue With Better CommunicationWhen most people think of change fatigue, they think of the volume of change. But it could be more about how that change is communicated. Michele Moskowitz, group head of talent at TP ICAP, emphasized that leaders have more control here than they might think.“Change fatigue comes when change becomes tiresome,” she said, but added an important distinction: “people are never really fatigued by positive change, by things that are exciting and inspirational.” The difference lies in how the change is framed and reinforced.At TP ICAP, leaders focus on consistently answering a core question for employees: what’s in it for me? By clearly communicating why a change matters, whether it’s a merger, a new system, or a strategic shift, and repeating that message across channels, organizations can shift change from something imposed to something employees can connect with and even anticipate.Leaders spoke about "Change Fatigue Is Real: How Leaders Can Keep Teams Adapting," during the executive panel discussionEqually critical is moving beyond one-way communication. Moskowitz described a common failure point that leaders are relying on top-down messaging and expecting alignment to follow. “We have a leader who stands up at a town hall or sends out a big email and kind of expects the world to just follow their lead,” she said. Instead, organizations must invest in dialogue, not just announcements.That’s where managers play a pivotal role. Moskowitz calls them “meaning makers,” the ones responsible for translating strategy into reality and feeding employee sentiment back up to leadership. Supporting them with the right tools, training, and space to listen is essential to reducing fatigue. Without that middle layer functioning effectively, even well-designed strategies struggle to land.Acknowledging the Toll, Recognizing the EffortOne of the most overlooked aspects of change fatigue is its psychological weight. Naomi Dishington, director of consulting at Workhuman, pointed out that employees today are living inside a constant loop of change.“It feels like at least weekly, if not daily, we’re all embarking on that change again every day,” she said, leaving little time to process or recover. The result is a workforce that rarely gets the chance to fully move through the natural emotional cycle of adaptation.For leaders, the first step is acknowledging it, then they can move to fix it. That simple act of recognition can reduce stress and build trust, signaling to employees that their experience is valid and understood. From there, leaders can make change more manageable by breaking it into smaller, shared steps rather than presenting transformation as a single overwhelming goal, she says.Equally important is how organizations define recognition itself. In a constantly shifting environment, waiting to celebrate only outcomes is no longer sufficient. Dishington emphasized the importance of rewarding effort, not just success: “Recognize the process, recognize you raised your hand to volunteer, recognize you took a risk and you failed.”These moments reinforce the behaviors organizations need most right now, including adaptability, initiative, and resilience. Recognition becomes not just a reward system, but a cultural signal about what matters in times of uncertainty.Adaptability Is EssentialPointing to the growing importance of what’s often called the adaptability quotient, or AQ, panelist Cesar Salas, VP and head of HR operations, Americas at EXL, says roles are shifting faster than ever.“What I am doing now in my position is totally different from what I was doing two years ago, or one year ago, or even six months ago,” he said. That pace forces employees and leaders to accept a hard truth: what got you here won’t necessarily move you forward.At EXL, Salas is focused on turning adaptability into practice rather than theory. He asked his direct reports to identify “five mini projects” where AI could be applied to improve productivity. The key was not immediate execution, but identification and prioritization.By surfacing opportunities first, then selecting the ones with the highest impact, teams create momentum without overwhelming themselves. This approach builds what Salas describes as a “virtuous circle,” or small wins that reinforce learning, confidence, and continued experimentation.Adaptability, he says, is no longer optional. It is becoming a baseline requirement for both employees and leaders. Organizations that fail to build this muscle risk falling behind not because of technology itself, but because of how slowly people are able to adjust to it.Transparency Builds TrustIn times of constant change, employees are not just looking for honesty about how decisions are made. Lacey McBurney, chief people and culture officer at Wiley, emphasized that traditional communication often falls short because it focuses too heavily on outcomes rather than process. “Yes, you have to communicate what the change is, yes, you have to communicate why that change is important,” she said. “But we’ve been really focused on how the decision got made.”That distinction is critical. When employees understand the reasoning, constraints, and trade-offs behind decisions, they are far more likely to trust them—even when the news is difficult. Without that transparency, gaps are filled with speculation and skepticism.As McBurney noted, without context, employees often respond with questions like: “Why didn’t they consider this?” or “Why are they doing these things at the same time?”Wiley has also invested in continuous listening mechanisms, moving away from one-off feedback cycles. Instead of treating communication as an event-driven activity, the organization has embedded ongoing dialogue through leadership forums and smaller group discussions. This helps trust become part of the system, not just part of major announcements.Create Space for ChangeOne of the hardest truths for leaders to accept is that you cannot continuously add work without also taking something away. In today’s environment of nonstop transformation, creating space is essential.“You can’t have a conversation around this sort of change climate today without talking about where we can create slack in the system,” said Sallyanne Oettinger, senior director at LHH. Without that slack, even the best-designed initiatives risk overwhelming employees.The challenge is that prioritization sounds simple but rarely is. Teams often begin with the intention of streamlining work, only to find that “everything ends up in the urgent and important quadrant, no matter how hard we try.” Real prioritization requires difficult trade-offs, including saying no to initiatives that people value.That difficulty is amplified by the reality that change is no longer linear. “It’s simply not that anymore,” Oettinger said, describing organizations as “trying to swim to seven beaches at once.” In that environment, constant addition without relief accelerates fatigue.One solution is increasing employee agency over how those changes are implemented. That involvement reduces disengagement and helps people feel less like passive recipients of disruption. Ultimately, creating space is about resourcing people properly. “Employees need a little bit more slack, so that not everything is a burning priority,” she said. Without that breathing room, even strong strategies fail to land.In a business landscape where change is no longer episodic but constant, the leaders who succeed will not be the ones who understand and design for change fatigue and actively work to reduce its weight. Change fatigue isn’t going away. But it can be managed. And how organizations choose to manage it will define not just how well they adapt—but how well their people endure what comes next.Carrie Snider is a Phoenix-based journalist and marketing copywriter.(Photos by Josh Larson for From Day One)

Story cover image
Feature BY Emily McCrary-Ruiz-Esparza | July 01, 2026

Can AI Teach Workers to Be More Human?

It started as an experiment. A little over a year ago, the chief talent and development officer at pharmaceutical firm Novartis ran a pilot. Paula Landmann, who’s responsible for making sure the company has the skills it needs, wanted to know: Can we use AI for the personal development of our workforce?Employees already had access to internal coaches, but humans are limited by time, and so it could be weeks before a coaching session was available. They also had access to tools like Copilot and ChatGPT, which they could consult about any number of things. But what if they put some real power behind it? If Novartis could roll out an AI-powered coaching program specifically designed to interact with employees the way a personal coach might, could the workforce actually develop itself?Apparently, the answer is yes. Last October, Novartis rolled out its AI coaching platform, called Mira, which it developed in conjunction with coaching platform BetterUp. Unlike traditional coaching programs, which are provided only to high-ranking managers and those headed for the C-suite, every employee at Novartis, at every level, has access to Mira—whenever they need it. Less than a year later, 14,000 employees, or just over 18% of Novartis’s workforce, are using the tool, which remains optional, and many of them keep coming back. They’re getting better at making decisions, talking to one another, and working together.Novartis is hardly alone. Customer-experience platform Qualfon developed its own AI-powered roleplay simulator to help employees improve communication, and media company Scripps licensed an AI coach that gives feedback to reporters on drafts and sourcing. Twenty percent of the newsroom employees use it daily, said senior L&D director Ginger Summers during a From Day One webinar. Those employees now use the tool one to two hours per day, saving roughly 20 minutes of work each time.These are what might be considered uniquely “human” skills, like critical thinking, communication, cooperation, collaboration, and conflict resolution—things typically developed only through interaction among humans.The interpersonal friction that begets these skills can, in theory, cost a business time and money, so companies are looking at AI and wondering if it would be faster, possibly even more effective, to develop those same skills with AI. The promise is great: AI could effectively furnish each employee with a personal coach whose sole focus is that employee’s development. But are these skills, when developed in collaboration with AI, as strong as they could be? And what’s lost when the experience with humans is removed from human skills?A Closer Look at AI-Powered Skill DevelopmentTo answer those questions, AI for skill development is being heavily studied by academics and by the companies building the technology. Consulting firm BCG put its own program to the test, placing human trainers (in virtual classrooms) head to head with virtual AI coaches and found that “the gen AI tutor delivered results that were on par with the classroom session, but with significant improvements in terms of personalization and efficiency.” And not only did the BCG researchers favor AI, learners themselves said the AI was better than humans at supplying personalized notes. BCG lauds AI’s ability to tailor the learning based on individual work context in a way a human just can’t.AI can be more succinct than humans, making for time savings, and it can also make learners less fearful of making mistakes. It’s far less embarrassing to fumble in front of a bot than a person, especially if you might sit in a meeting with them later. Landmann of Novartis said employees were “very loud and clear” about this advantage. “AI doesn’t judge me,” they told her.Paula Landmann, chief talent and development officer at Novartis (company photo)Employees at Novartis also prefer the AI coach to human coaches for their availability. While the company does make human coaches available, their time is limited. So if your coach isn’t available for another month, but your difficult conversation happens tomorrow—Mira can offer help right away. And users can practice in their preferred style: via keyboard, like an instant messenger, or via voice, like a phone call. Employees can start with a theme, take a personality assessment, engage in role play, or simply jump into conversation about their problem—these coaches don’t need time to prepare. They’re always on and always ready to go.Still, some skeptics are sounding the alarm, or at least seriously questioning the hype over using AI to train people to do people things. Constance Noonan Hadley and Sarah L. Wright, both academic researchers, posit that overuse can cause social skills to atrophy by making it easier to choose relatively frictionless AI interactions over humans that might push back or simply make us uncomfortable. “Talking with an always reachable, sycophantic AI chatbot can be more appealing than conversing with real people,” they write in Harvard Business Review. And “by removing the need to go to colleagues for help, AI can undermine opportunities to build trust.” They recommend that “coaching, mentoring, conflict resolution, and team building remain primarily human functions and be conducted in person to build relationships.” In other words, leave the human skills to the humans. “The friction, the back-and-forth, even the occasional miscommunication—these aren’t bugs in the system, they’re features,” writes HBR editor Amy Gallo. And the less interaction we have with our colleagues, the lonelier and more socially isolated we can become.The Sycophancy TrapZoë Wigan, a former employment attorney and current head of the resolutions team at consultancy Byrne Dean, worries that AI is making it too easy to escalate problems that are better dealt with face-to-ace. One sign is the number of grievance letters HR leaders receive.  She told From Day One that grievances—that is, formal letters of complaint that an employee submits regarding a colleague or manager—are overwhelming people teams. “Almost every time I have coffee with someone in HR and you say, ‘What’s keeping you busy?,’ almost everybody says ‘AI grievances.’”This may be the result of AI sycophancy. Someone who suspects their manager is being unfair will almost certainly hear that reinforced by an AI coach. And it might even push them along, offering to write up a grievance letter then and there. Qualms escalate to the level of formal grievances more quickly than they otherwise would have—qualms that, in another time, may have been handled without HR at all.Landmann was concerned about this from the start. “I always worry that AI can be very nice to us, very soft,” she said. “It wants to please us constantly, right?” But a good coach doesn’t do that. When testing tools for Novartis, she was keen on finding one low on sycophancy and willing to challenge users both during the coaching session and after the fact, following up to find out how it all played out.Managers in a PinchWhen Coinbase CEO Brian Armstrong announced that the company would be laying off 14% of its staff, he noted that there would be “no pure managers,” and anyone who remained must be “a strong and active individual contributor,” and managers everywhere cradled their heads in their hands.People managers are under tremendous stress, being asked to take on more responsibility, which lately includes rolling out AI tools, if not finding use cases to begin with. Many are handed AI and told to use it, but they’re often not told what to use it on. The time-consuming act of coaching employees seems as good a use as any.Given the pressures, they can hardly be blamed for what some are calling overuse. “I think most organizations are probably sleepwalking into just how complex it’s becoming for managers,” said Byrne Dean’s CEO Nick McClelland. “Work has just got more complex, and AI itself actually increases the complexity in terms of managing people.” He told From Day One that he expects to see a significant increase in the number of difficult conversations managers are asked to have—“with their team, with peers, with senior members of teams because of the complexity of work”—and AI can be a huge help.AI has and will always win when it comes to scalability. While no organization can afford a personal coach for each employee, it probably can afford universal AI licenses. Byrne Dean, which will still continue offering its traditional classroom training sessions on difficult conversations, is launching its own AI-powered conversation tool, currently in its beta stage.McClelland explained that this could be the tip of the spear for HR, which “is seen as a cost center as opposed to a profit generator.” Difficult conversations are all too easy to avoid, or at least postpone, to the extent that the company suffers from poor performance, infighting, just the clog of team politics. “HR can start to flip the narrative,” McClelland said. When AI affords ample opportunity for practice and preparation, “being able to have that conversation and rehearse ahead of time feels like a really natural business gain.”But Landmann sees it differently. The Mira platform isn’t actually saving Novartis any money. On the contrary. “It’s an investment in people,” she explained. “The biggest business case is the growth and development of our people.” This is a long play, she said, and it has already been worth it. Emily McCrary-Ruiz-Esparza is an independent journalist and From Day One contributing editor who writes about business and the world of work. Her work has appeared in the Economist, the BBC, The Washington Post, Inc., and Business Insider, among others. She is the recipient of a Virginia Press Association award for business and financial journalism. She is the host of How to Be Anything, the podcast about people with unusual jobs.(Featured photo by Style-Photography/iStock by Getty Images)

Story cover image

What Our Attendees are Saying

Jordan Baker(Attendee) profile picture

“The panels were phenomenal. The breakout sessions were incredibly insightful. I got the opportunity to speak with countless HR leaders who are dedicated to improving people’s lives. I walked away feeling excited about my own future in the business world, knowing that many of today’s people leaders are striving for a more diverse, engaged, and inclusive workforce.”

– Jordan Baker, Emplify
Desiree Booker(Attendee) profile picture

“Thank you, From Day One, for such an important conversation on diversity and inclusion, employee engagement and social impact.”

– Desiree Booker, ColorVizion Lab
Kim Vu(Attendee) profile picture

“Timely and much needed convo about the importance of removing the stigma and providing accessible mental health resources for all employees.”

– Kim Vu, Remitly
Florangela Davila(Attendee) profile picture

“Great discussion about leadership, accountability, transparency and equity. Thanks for having me, From Day One.”

– Florangela Davila, KNKX 88.5 FM
Cory Hewett(Attendee) profile picture

“De-stigmatizing mental health illnesses, engaging stakeholders, arriving at mutually defined definitions for equity, and preventing burnout—these are important topics that I’m delighted are being discussed at the From Day One conference.”

– Cory Hewett, Gimme Vending Inc.
Trisha Stezzi(Attendee) profile picture

“Thank you for bringing speakers and influencers into one space so we can all continue our work scaling up the impact we make in our organizations and in the world!”

– Trisha Stezzi, Significance LLC
Vivian Greentree(Attendee) profile picture

“From Day One provided a full day of phenomenal learning opportunities and best practices in creating & nurturing corporate values while building purposeful relationships with employees, clients, & communities.”

– Vivian Greentree, Fiserv
Chip Maxwell(Attendee) profile picture

“We always enjoy and are impressed by your events, and this was no exception.”

– Chip Maxwell, Emplify
Katy Romero(Attendee) profile picture

“We really enjoyed the event yesterday— such an engaged group of attendees and the content was excellent. I'm feeling great about our decision to partner with FD1 this year.”

– Katy Romero, One Medical
Kayleen Perkins(Attendee) profile picture

“The From Day One Conference in Seattle was filled with people who want to make a positive impact in their company, and build an inclusive culture around diversity and inclusion. Thank you to all the panelists and speakers for sharing their expertise and insights. I'm looking forward to next year's event!”

– Kayleen Perkins, Seattle Children's
Michaela Ayers(Attendee) profile picture

“I had the pleasure of attending From Day One. My favorite session, Getting Bias Out of Our Systems, was such a powerful conversation between local thought leaders.”

– Michaela Ayers, Nourish Events
Sarah J. Rodehorst(Attendee) profile picture

“Inspiring speakers and powerful conversations. Loved meeting so many talented people driving change in their organizations. Thank you From Day One! I look forward to next year’s event!”

– Sarah J. Rodehorst, ePerkz
Angela Prater(Attendee) profile picture

“I had the distinct pleasure of attending From Day One Seattle. The Getting Bias Out of Our Systems discussion was inspirational and eye-opening.”

– Angela Prater, Confluence Health
Joel Stupka(Attendee) profile picture

“From Day One did an amazing job of providing an exceptional experience for both the attendees and vendors. I mean, we had whale sharks and giant manta rays gracefully swimming by on the other side of the hall from our booth!”

– Joel Stupka, SkillCycle
Alexis Hauk(Attendee) profile picture

“Last week I had the honor of moderating a panel on healthy work environments at the From Day One conference in Atlanta. I was so inspired by what these experts had to say about the timely and important topics of mental health in the workplace and the value of nurturing a culture of psychological safety.”

– Alexis Hauk, Emory University