FromDayOne, Inc's logo

Conferences and journalism for HR and marketing leaders

From Day One is a media outlet covering innovative ways organizations build stronger relationships with employees, customers, and communities, with reporting on leadership, employee experience, workplace well-being, brand trust, and AI.

Latest reporting on People & HR, Advertising and Marketing

Live Conference Recap BY Jessica Swenson | October 08, 2026

The AI-Enabled Workforce: Redefining How People and Technology Work Together

There’s no doubt that some elements of business will always need a human touch, regardless of how efficient AI can make us. “In a world where all the popular media is saying, ‘What are we going to automate? What are we going to streamline? What are we going to change?’ I have really had a lot of success flipping that question and saying, what needs to remain radically human and why?” said Christopher Rosett, head of global workforce design at Vanguard. He encourages companies to reflect on their competitive advantage and their risk tolerance when considering how to integrate AI into their operations. The delicate balance between human and machine was the topic of a panel moderated by Philadelphia Inquirer reporter Ximena Conde at From Day One’s Philadelphia conference.By embracing a strategy of elevating human potential at the “intersection of human capital and digital capital,” Jonelle Coletta Parker, SVP of the HR, research, development, & commercialization people organization at Bristol Myers Squibb (BMS), said her organization is seeing faster, higher-quality outcomes, including improved patient outcomes. Parker shared that BMS has “recently launched the equivalent of an augmented GPT, which means that some of the members of that team are in fact digitized.” This method has magnified the teams’ workforce intelligence, she says, “because instead of having one person who represents the medical or the clinical development team, you have this agent who's able to pull from many, many places.”Ximena Conde, reporter at the Philadelphia Inquirer, moderated the sessionPanelists widely agreed that AI is appropriate for repetitive, continuous work that doesn’t require human nuance and judgment. Catherine DaGrossa, corporate VP of HR for New York Life sees value in using AI to identify, synthesize, and analyze data patterns and create simulations. But since her company is accountable to policy owners over the long term, it is careful about where it fits AI into its processes.“We have to really think about where we’re willing to put a machine in between us and our customers,” she said, “and the moments that matter most to families, we’re not willing.” That’s why humans are still connected at touchpoints that can create or lose trust, like claim decisions and performance reviews. That said, New York Life’s most-used AI agent, with 7,000 employee and 9,000 leader hits, was built for performance review season; it helps both employees and leaders prepare for review conversations. Getting data into the hands of customer-facing operations, increased expertise in actuarial and underwriting, and improved sales data are some key areas Matt Geis, SVP of HR at Lincoln Financial Group cited as ripe for AI integration. “I think about product manufacturing and being able to more quickly do pricing analysis or product redesign so that we can be faster or nimbler in the marketplace,” said Geis. “Being able to make your sales force that much better with where they're going, and what data they're bringing once they get there—it's invaluable.”Acknowledging employee fears and the potentially divisive nature of AI, empathy and effective change management emerged as common themes among panelists. Samantha Davis, CIO, Americas, at Arkema, reflected on a Microsoft CoWork pilot that shortened a monthly FP&A report timeline from 5–7 days to 30­–45 seconds. This caused fear among the team historically responsible for this report.“That’s a really real fear. It’s something they’re feeling. It’s not right or wrong, and it’s real for them at that moment.” Davis said. “So I think when we show things like that, preparing for who the audience is and the possible outcomes of sharing that, so you can anticipate from a point of possible empathy or information, is really important.”DaGrossa described the challenge as a “change management problem disguised in a technology costume.” She suggests easing up on ambition and speed to ensure adequate training and authentic engagement.Geis emphasizes that AI use is a journey, comparing it to the advent of electricity and the internet and asserting that humans are resilient and adaptable. “Once you start using the tool and realizing what it can do and how it can make your job easier,” he said, “When employees start to see that, that gives time for people to develop, to learn, and to see how it can make their jobs better.”As workflows change and AI becomes more ubiquitous, roles and performance evaluation will also shift. Parker says that real-time data is helping provide more clarity on what people are actually measured against. As the volume of curricula production has increased for BMS’s commercial learning group, the team was initially fearful that an AI agent would create all content and eliminate their roles. But it turned out that their human ability to distill science-dense content into user-friendly learning materials is invaluable.As organizations and employees adjust to these new ways of working, Rosett encourages people to remember that many of the tasks teams are used to doing still need to be done—the focus on how to do them is just changing. “If you’re feeling a little bit intimidated by all this tech stuff, and the terms,” he said, “know that a lot of the really core foundational strategic work that HR has been good at for a really long time is critical to how AI is going to get enabled in your organization. That’s a really important place where we’re focusing energy in upskilling how HR can show up and help.”Jessica Swenson is a freelance writer and proofreader based in the Midwest. Learn more about her at jmswensonllc.com.(Photos by Josh Larson for From Day One)

The AI-Enabled Workforce: Redefining How People and Technology Work Together
News BY Grace Turney | September 09, 2026

Ghost Jobs Are About to Get Expensive for Employers

Ghost jobs, online job listings for positions that do not actually exist or that a company has no immediate intention of filling, are becoming more than just an annoyance for job seekers. While eager applicants took the time to personalize and submit their resumes, portfolios, and cover letters, anxiously hoping for a call that could lead to their dream job, the company was really looking to build a talent pipeline, signify growth, placate current employees, or meet compliance rules. But ghost jobs may no longer help companies fulfill compliance requirements, and are turning into a compliance risk.New York’s Senate Bill S8877, which passed the state legislature in June and was delivered to Gov. Kathy Hochul, would fine employers $2,500 per publication or digital platform for failing to disclose real hiring intent. If the bill passes, it would have a major impact on the job market, for both hiring companies and job seekers alike.Ghost jobs have gone from an open secret to a measurable epidemic. Criteria Corp’s 2026 Candidate Experience Report shows that more than half, 53%, of job seekers experienced ghosting within the last year. That figure comes amid a three-year rise in employer ghosting: 48% of applicants were ignored by employers in 2025, up from 38% in 2024, according to Fortune. Pennsylvania’s proposed Ghost Job Postings Prevention Act and Ontario’s new job posting requirements (effective Jan. 1) indicate that this isn’t a one-state phenomenon. Other states, including California and New Jersey, are considering anti-ghost job legislation, as well.Meanwhile, employers are facing another challenge: application volume. Robert Half reported that 67% of HR leaders say AI-generated applications are slowing hiring. The volume problem that makes ghost postings tempting (pipeline-building, optics of growth) is intensifying, not easing.New York’s S8877 would require employers to state in job listings that the post is for a current vacancy with a specific fill date. If they don’t plan to fill the position within 90 days, they must specify that as a “no sooner than” date. Employers would also have to specify if the job is not for a current vacancy but the employer is seeking resumes for potential future openings. Employers and third-party advertisers must take down a job advertisement within two weeks after it’s filled. If companies advertise jobs violating the statute, they could be fined $2,500 for each publication or digital platform where the posting appears, with the fine doubling if the violation is not rectified within 30 days.For HR teams, that means ghost-job compliance could become an operational issue, not just a legal one. Employers would need to know exactly where each job posting is listed, distinguish active openings from pipeline postings, document intended hiring dates, and create processes for removing filled positions from every platform. A job posted simultaneously on a company careers page, LinkedIn, Indeed, and a third-party recruiting site could rack up multiple potential violations from a single stale posting.But the stakes go beyond fines. New research suggests that repeated negative experiences with the labor market can shape how people view work itself. According to a June 2026 NBER working paper, men’s labor-force participation is influenced by beliefs about the returns to working, which are shaped by their experiences with the labor market. Those effects can persist even when men move to different states, and the researchers argue that short-term declines in labor demand can produce long-term declines in labor supply.Ghost jobs are not the only factor influencing those beliefs, and the NBER study does not specifically examine ghost postings. But the implication for employers is worth considering: If workers repeatedly encounter jobs that appear available but never lead anywhere, they may learn that pursuing work is less worthwhile than they once believed.That matters at a time when the labor force is already under pressure. The Bureau of Labor Statistics reported that the labor-force participation rate fell to 61.5% in June, while 6 million people who were not in the labor force said they wanted a job. And Lightcast projects that the U.S. could face a shortfall of roughly 6 million workers before the end of the decade.Ghost jobs are evolving from a convenient recruiting tactic into a serious liability with legal, operational, and potentially long-term talent-pipeline consequences. As the competition for workers intensifies, companies may want to think twice before asking candidates to invest their time and trust in a job that was never really there.Grace Turney is a St. Louis-based writer, artist, and former librarian. See more of her work at graceturney17.wixsite.com/mysite.(Photo by FangXiaNuo/iStock)

Ghost Jobs Are About to Get Expensive for Employers

Upcoming HR and marketing events

What attendees say about From Day One conferences

Jordan Baker, Emplify — From Day One attendee

“The panels were phenomenal. The breakout sessions were incredibly insightful. I got the opportunity to speak with countless HR leaders who are dedicated to improving people’s lives. I walked away feeling excited about my own future in the business world, knowing that many of today’s people leaders are striving for a more diverse, engaged, and inclusive workforce.”

– Jordan Baker, Emplify
Desiree Booker, ColorVizion Lab — From Day One attendee

“Thank you, From Day One, for such an important conversation on diversity and inclusion, employee engagement and social impact.”

– Desiree Booker, ColorVizion Lab
Kim Vu, Remitly — From Day One attendee

“Timely and much needed convo about the importance of removing the stigma and providing accessible mental health resources for all employees.”

– Kim Vu, Remitly
Florangela Davila, KNKX 88.5 FM — From Day One attendee

“Great discussion about leadership, accountability, transparency and equity. Thanks for having me, From Day One.”

– Florangela Davila, KNKX 88.5 FM
Cory Hewett, Gimme Vending Inc. — From Day One attendee

“De-stigmatizing mental health illnesses, engaging stakeholders, arriving at mutually defined definitions for equity, and preventing burnout—these are important topics that I’m delighted are being discussed at the From Day One conference.”

– Cory Hewett, Gimme Vending Inc.
Trisha Stezzi, Significance LLC  — From Day One attendee

“Thank you for bringing speakers and influencers into one space so we can all continue our work scaling up the impact we make in our organizations and in the world!”

– Trisha Stezzi, Significance LLC
Vivian Greentree, Fiserv — From Day One attendee

“From Day One provided a full day of phenomenal learning opportunities and best practices in creating & nurturing corporate values while building purposeful relationships with employees, clients, & communities.”

– Vivian Greentree, Fiserv
Chip Maxwell, Emplify — From Day One attendee

“We always enjoy and are impressed by your events, and this was no exception.”

– Chip Maxwell, Emplify
Katy Romero, One Medical — From Day One attendee

“We really enjoyed the event yesterday— such an engaged group of attendees and the content was excellent. I'm feeling great about our decision to partner with FD1 this year.”

– Katy Romero, One Medical
Kayleen Perkins, Seattle Children's — From Day One attendee

“The From Day One Conference in Seattle was filled with people who want to make a positive impact in their company, and build an inclusive culture around diversity and inclusion. Thank you to all the panelists and speakers for sharing their expertise and insights. I'm looking forward to next year's event!”

– Kayleen Perkins, Seattle Children's
Michaela Ayers, Nourish Events — From Day One attendee

“I had the pleasure of attending From Day One. My favorite session, Getting Bias Out of Our Systems, was such a powerful conversation between local thought leaders.”

– Michaela Ayers, Nourish Events
Sarah J. Rodehorst, ePerkz — From Day One attendee

“Inspiring speakers and powerful conversations. Loved meeting so many talented people driving change in their organizations. Thank you From Day One! I look forward to next year’s event!”

– Sarah J. Rodehorst, ePerkz
Angela Prater, Confluence Health — From Day One attendee

“I had the distinct pleasure of attending From Day One Seattle. The Getting Bias Out of Our Systems discussion was inspirational and eye-opening.”

– Angela Prater, Confluence Health
Joel Stupka, SkillCycle — From Day One attendee

“From Day One did an amazing job of providing an exceptional experience for both the attendees and vendors. I mean, we had whale sharks and giant manta rays gracefully swimming by on the other side of the hall from our booth!”

– Joel Stupka, SkillCycle
Alexis Hauk, Emory University — From Day One attendee

“Last week I had the honor of moderating a panel on healthy work environments at the From Day One conference in Atlanta. I was so inspired by what these experts had to say about the timely and important topics of mental health in the workplace and the value of nurturing a culture of psychological safety.”

– Alexis Hauk, Emory University