FromDayOne, Inc's logo
STORIES
Feature BY Erin Behrens | June 09, 2026

Meet The AI Natives Who Don’t Want to Be

Just because they’re good at it, doesn’t mean they like it. Growing up with algorithmic feeds and AI-generated content, Gen Z is one of the most AI-fluent generations, but increasingly, they’re the most skeptical of it. It’s a paradox playing out in the workplace, on social media, and even on the stages of this year’s commencement ceremonies, where VIP-speaker references to the promise of AI were met with choruses of boos.Many employers have assumed that because Gen Z grew up alongside these tools, they’re both comfortable and confident using them in professional settings. But the reality is far more complicated, and to understand how Gen Z is actually navigating this moment, From Day One went straight to the source.A Label That Might Not FitFirst, the roots of the label. An AI native “refers to something—usually a product, company or workflow—that was designed from the ground up with AI as a core component, not bolted on later as a mere feature,” according to an IBM explainer. In some cases, Gen Z has been given this title simply due to the timeline of AI’s emergence in the workforce and education. Having been early adopters in terms of their age, they’re generally not getting into a deeper commitment. According to a Gallup poll, “Gen Z’s use of generative AI in everyday life has been largely stable since March 2025. About half (51%) of 14 to 29 year olds continue to say they use AI either daily (22%) or weekly (29%), while 11% report using it monthly, 20% every few months, and 19% say they never use it.” But use doesn’t necessarily equate to trust or excitement. “In most of these cases, Gen Z-ers have become increasingly skeptical, increasingly negative—from a place where even last year, they weren’t particularly positive about it,” Zach Hrynowski, a senior education researcher for Gallup, told the New York Times.Rocki Rockingham, chief HR officer at GE Appliances, notices that younger employees aren’t more trusting of AI than their older counterparts, but on the other hand, they are “more willing to take chances. To try new things, to do things differently,” she said at From Day One’s Miami conference. It’s a distinction worth making at a time when Gen Z’s feelings about the new technology grow more complicated. The Pipeline ProblemRecruiters and hiring managers are increasingly flagging AI fluency as a core qualification in the workforce. It’s no longer a differentiator, but table stakes. An ominous new corporate cliché has even been propagated: AI won’t take your job, but someone who knows how to use it will. Postings that once listed tools like Google Suite and Canva are now leading with ChatGPT and prompt engineering. The message to Gen Z candidates is clear: you were born into this, so you should know it.The expectation of AI fluency creates uneven ground for those early in their careers who may not have hands-on experience with the technology, widening the gap between candidates before they’ve even had a chance to compete. Dani Monaghan, the SVP of global talent enablement at Expedia Group, worries about the access. “If you’re not taught AI at school or in university, and you don’t have the means to access technology, I think the gap is bigger than it will ever be before,” she said at From Day One’s Seattle conference. It’s a gap that’s leaving members of Gen Z increasingly wary. One member of Gen Z, Alec Gautier, a graduate of Marist University’s class of 2023 and now a retention specialist at Saatva, says his attitude toward AI “is one of skepticism.” At root is his distrust of its creators. “I am not inherently opposed to the idea of generative AI, but its current architects and proprietors have, to put it lightly, dubious motives,” he said. This skepticism seems to be a trend, with 14% of Gen Z reporting a decline in excitement in AI since 2025, and 48% believing the risks in the workforce outweigh the benefits, according to Gallup data. Even if Gen Z realizes that AI will have to be part of their working lives, they don’t like the side effects and don’t want to wear the label.Their Role in Leading AI ResistanceWhile Gen Z is being cast as the face of AI prodigy in the workplace, they are also the ones leading the resistance against it, or at least, being the loudest about their unease with it. At graduation ceremonies this spring across the U.S., many graduates hooted at distinguished commencement speakers who spoke of AI, including former Google CEO Eric Schmidt at the University of Arizona. He acknowledged that graduates feared “that the future has already been written, that the machines are coming, that the jobs are evaporating, that the climate is breaking, that politics are fractured, and that you are inheriting a mess that you did not create.” But he told them, essentially, that if they don’t like it, they should just fix it. Alvarado, records management specialist at the Jefferson County Clerk's Office in Watertown, NY, shared her thoughts on the AI boom (photo courtesy of Alvarado)Indeed, students, new graduates, and those early in their careers are experiencing existential concerns about AI’s ethics and its impact on their life and work. They worry about how it affects our ability to connect and be creative, and also the mere amount of “slop” being brought into the world. “AI is just being used way too commonly across all fields, including art, music, fashion, writing, anything that takes a little bit of creativity or brainpower,” Hailey Alvarado, a St. Lawrence University class of 2022 alumna, told From Day One. “When we have an automated intelligence that is programmed to affirm everything we say to it, there is no actual intelligence. It’s just a robot designed to agree with us,” she said.Gen Z also worries about their ability to find early-career roles at a time when entry-level jobs are being stripped away. “Companies are citing A.I. as the reason for mass layoffs; according to the Alliance for Secure A.I., there have been almost 120,000 A.I.-linked job losses in the United States just since last year. Recent college graduates are facing a brutal job market as entry-level positions disappear and A.I. renders the application process inhumanly opaque,” according to the New York Times. And those fortunate enough to get jobs may be arriving just in time to find that “AI is unraveling the social fabric of work,” as Aki Ito, chief correspondent at Business Insider, reported last month. Perhaps most importantly, the generation fears the technology’s environmental impact as its ubiquitous data centers gobble up resources and spew pollution. Having grown up in a world marked by environmental disasters and an escalating climate crisis, Gen Z has long been associated with sustainability activism, and their skepticism of AI is no exception. “While I do have some personal and professional concerns about AI, they are wholly secondary compared to my environmental concerns about the technology,” said Gautier. “The environmental implications of AI I find deeply troubling. The proliferation of data centers and the damage they’ve already done to local ecosystems, public spaces, and fresh-water sources in vulnerable communities is extremely distressing,” he said. The Future of Connection, Creativity, and WorkNo generation can be reduced to a single trait or defining point, but when a crowd of graduates erupts in unanimous boos when their supposed role models mention AI, it’s hard to dismiss it as anything other than a distress signal. Whether it’s a trend, a backlash, or something more lasting, one thing is clear: Gen Z’s relationship with AI is far more portentous than the “AI native” label suggests.The frustration for many isn’t just about the technology itself, but also about what gets lost when we rush to adopt it. Said Alvarado: “We need more true, genuine connections, more creative expression, more critical thinking. Not less. Not from a robot.”Erin Behrens is an associate editor at From Day One.(Featured photo by PeopleImages/iStock)

Story cover image
Live Conference Recap BY Katie Chambers | June 08, 2026

Finding True North: How to Lead Organizations Authentically and With Moral Clarity

What does it mean to be an authentic leader? “I’ve always wondered why that’s a hard question,” said Bill George, author of True North: Leading Authentically in Today’s Workplace, Emerging Leader Edition, and former CEO of Medtronic, during a fireside chat at From Day One’s Minneapolis conference. “I think a lot of people are afraid. They feel like they have to go into the workplace and wear a mask. Being authentic is being genuine; it’s being who you are. You [should] actually constantly grow as a leader. You’re adapting to a situation.”During the session moderated by Kristen Painter, business editor at the Minnesota Star Tribune, George shared practical strategies and techniques for navigating today’s complex world, including advice on personal values, crisis leadership, and self-awareness.What Is a Leader’s True North?In his book, George defines the new true north as a call for leaders to step up in an era of intersecting crises. “It’s easy to follow your true north, follow your values, your purpose, until you get under pressure, and you have to decide between two options,” George said. “And that’s the real test. Where there may be sacrifices you have to make, do you have the moral courage to step up and follow what you believe, or do you back down?”Painter noted one recent crisis: the sudden rollback on corporate DEI pledges. “Do you think moral courage is actually in decline, or has the cost of exercising it simply gone up for leaders?” she asked. George does think leaders are afraid of the current government, so even though they might quietly continue all DEI practices personally within the company, they don’t want it explicitly stated. He cites Costco leader Ron Backer as an ideal example of a leader who stood up for his beliefs in the face of DEI backlash and received an overwhelming 98% vote of support from his shareholders. It’s these moments that matter for an organization. “Do you stand up and be counted? Everyone’s watching you inside the company and outside the company, and they frankly don’t believe anything you say if you don’t stand up under pressure,” George said. Contrary to some belief, having a moral center is actually good for business. “You have to act. Everyone’s so worried about short-term earnings. You better worry about long-term building your organization with the right people.” A leader’s primary obligation, George says, is always to their employees. “Without employees, there’s no support for your customers.” One recent practical, and harrowing, example: Operation Metro Surge, the ICE invasion on Minneapolis. George advised companies to issue statements to their employees. “Our employees’ welfare is the number one thing we have to do, and we have,” he said. “We’ll provide a safe workplace, we’ll provide for your security, and we will do everything to provide for your well-being. And if there are any issues, we will send in our security teams and our lawyers to support you and to help you,” he said. He would have issued a blunt, honest statement like that to employees, and done so quickly. He feels that while some local business owners eventually rose to the moment, they generally waited too long. Why Nuance Is Effective “A lot of leaders snap back to what you’ve identified in this book as sort of a command-and-control style of leadership. I’ll call it an old school way of leading, very top down, very much it leads to micromanagement, which is a disempowering feeling for workers,” Painter said. Engaged leaders, rather than those blanketly issuing orders, are more effective. George cites Corie Barry of Best Buy as an example: during Covid, she closed 1,083 stores and furloughed 82,000 workers, once she could ensure they would be covered by government unemployment benefits. Then she encouraged each local store to convert to a warehouse for online shipping, letting the store decide how best to manage it for their own community. “She gave everyone the authority. So that to me is an engaged leader, an example of how you should lead in a crisis. But she didn’t just hang back in our office and say, ‘you guys handle it.’”Bill George signed complimentary copies of his book True North for session attendees George says one of the toughest problems faced by middle managers is when the top tier of leadership implements a “command-and-control” style, while the manager still wants to lead with morals and heart. “What you have to do is stay true to your values, your purpose, and perform. And if you perform, you’ll be okay, but you still have to be an empowering leader for your people. You can’t just flip [when times get tough],” he said. He encourages organizations to be ruthless when it comes to toxic leaders: move them out before they become too damaging. Middle managers should be empowered as leaders of their portion of the business, to inspire their own teams and take ownership over results. George advises that leaders “have the courage to be the voice of our values, and not to be rules-based, but to be empowering, and to make moves to ensure that we have empowering leaders throughout our organization.” That means going directly to workers to talk one-on-one about problems and work together on solutions, rather than relying on secondhand feedback that may be filtered. The future is less “hero leader” and more “coach.” And coaches care about their people. “Let them be in the part of the organization where they can use their greatest skills. Then align them around your purpose and values,” he said. “This is not soft. Challenge people! Ask them how they can do better. Work with them to solve problems.” Katie Chambers is a freelance writer and award-winning communications executive with a lifelong commitment to supporting artists and advocating for inclusion. Her work has been seen in HuffPost, Top Think, and several printed essay collections, and she has appeared on Cheddar News, iWomanTV, On New Jersey, and CBS New York.(Photos by Josh Larson for From Day One)

Story cover image

What Our Attendees are Saying

Jordan Baker(Attendee) profile picture

“The panels were phenomenal. The breakout sessions were incredibly insightful. I got the opportunity to speak with countless HR leaders who are dedicated to improving people’s lives. I walked away feeling excited about my own future in the business world, knowing that many of today’s people leaders are striving for a more diverse, engaged, and inclusive workforce.”

– Jordan Baker, Emplify
Desiree Booker(Attendee) profile picture

“Thank you, From Day One, for such an important conversation on diversity and inclusion, employee engagement and social impact.”

– Desiree Booker, ColorVizion Lab
Kim Vu(Attendee) profile picture

“Timely and much needed convo about the importance of removing the stigma and providing accessible mental health resources for all employees.”

– Kim Vu, Remitly
Florangela Davila(Attendee) profile picture

“Great discussion about leadership, accountability, transparency and equity. Thanks for having me, From Day One.”

– Florangela Davila, KNKX 88.5 FM
Cory Hewett(Attendee) profile picture

“De-stigmatizing mental health illnesses, engaging stakeholders, arriving at mutually defined definitions for equity, and preventing burnout—these are important topics that I’m delighted are being discussed at the From Day One conference.”

– Cory Hewett, Gimme Vending Inc.
Trisha Stezzi(Attendee) profile picture

“Thank you for bringing speakers and influencers into one space so we can all continue our work scaling up the impact we make in our organizations and in the world!”

– Trisha Stezzi, Significance LLC
Vivian Greentree(Attendee) profile picture

“From Day One provided a full day of phenomenal learning opportunities and best practices in creating & nurturing corporate values while building purposeful relationships with employees, clients, & communities.”

– Vivian Greentree, Fiserv
Chip Maxwell(Attendee) profile picture

“We always enjoy and are impressed by your events, and this was no exception.”

– Chip Maxwell, Emplify
Katy Romero(Attendee) profile picture

“We really enjoyed the event yesterday— such an engaged group of attendees and the content was excellent. I'm feeling great about our decision to partner with FD1 this year.”

– Katy Romero, One Medical
Kayleen Perkins(Attendee) profile picture

“The From Day One Conference in Seattle was filled with people who want to make a positive impact in their company, and build an inclusive culture around diversity and inclusion. Thank you to all the panelists and speakers for sharing their expertise and insights. I'm looking forward to next year's event!”

– Kayleen Perkins, Seattle Children's
Michaela Ayers(Attendee) profile picture

“I had the pleasure of attending From Day One. My favorite session, Getting Bias Out of Our Systems, was such a powerful conversation between local thought leaders.”

– Michaela Ayers, Nourish Events
Sarah J. Rodehorst(Attendee) profile picture

“Inspiring speakers and powerful conversations. Loved meeting so many talented people driving change in their organizations. Thank you From Day One! I look forward to next year’s event!”

– Sarah J. Rodehorst, ePerkz
Angela Prater(Attendee) profile picture

“I had the distinct pleasure of attending From Day One Seattle. The Getting Bias Out of Our Systems discussion was inspirational and eye-opening.”

– Angela Prater, Confluence Health
Joel Stupka(Attendee) profile picture

“From Day One did an amazing job of providing an exceptional experience for both the attendees and vendors. I mean, we had whale sharks and giant manta rays gracefully swimming by on the other side of the hall from our booth!”

– Joel Stupka, SkillCycle
Alexis Hauk(Attendee) profile picture

“Last week I had the honor of moderating a panel on healthy work environments at the From Day One conference in Atlanta. I was so inspired by what these experts had to say about the timely and important topics of mental health in the workplace and the value of nurturing a culture of psychological safety.”

– Alexis Hauk, Emory University