Opinion BY Bill Saporito | June 30, 2025

The Jobs Aren't Getting Done: How the Immigration Crackdown Is Hurting Business

The resistance to President Trump’s immigration crackdown began with dramatic street theater. The scenes got uglier by the day. Masked, heavily armed agents from the Immigration and Customers Enforcement (ICE) agency descended on workplaces where immigrants are employed and hauling them away, some in front of their terrified children. In Los Angeles, local protests over the sweeps prompted the White House to federalize California’s National Guard and dispatch U.S. Marines, purportedly to restore order and protect federal buildings. A U.S. senator was forcibly removed and arrested at a press conference by Homeland Security chief Kristi Noem.  Now, however, resistance is coming from other quarters. Business owners—farmers, restaurateurs, meatpackers, hoteliers—are finding their operations under siege. And understaffed. They’re letting their Congressional reps know it; and alarmed farmers, with a shortage of workers to pick their crops, complained to Secretary of Agriculture Brooke Rollins. In Florida, State Senator Ileana Garcia, co-founder of Latinas for Trump, labeled the raids as “unacceptable and inhumane.”The us-vs.-them tension that has characterized America’s relationship with its immigrants has been a feature of national politics for centuries. Today it is a focal point of the second Trump administration. After all, making migrants the targets of MAGA helped get Trump elected.  But support for mass deportation is now being viewed in the harsh reality of its execution. And harsh may underestimate the level of cruelty involved in the detentions. No wonder there are some reverberations. That’s why Trump, no stranger to vacillation, briefly reversed course, ordering ICE to stop raiding farms, hotels and restaurants, tweeting that “Our great Farmers and people in the Hotel and Leisure business have been stating that our very aggressive policy on immigration is taking very good, long time workers away from them, with those jobs being almost impossible to replace.” Days later, in the face of blowback from MAGA’s hard-liners, he reverted to TACO mode and ordered the raids to resume.The friction is playing out within the Administration too. Weeks before, former First Buddy Elon Musk clashed with America Firster Steve Bannon over immigration: Musk wants to allow more tech emigres, while Bannon wants to tighten the screws on programs such as H-1B visas. Given that crypto bros like Mark Zuckerberg backed the Trump campaign with hundreds of millions of PAC money, the faceoff had a particular edge to it.The internal politics aside, the heavy-handed ICE tactics are hitting a nerve with most people. Already, 54% of Americans are against increasing the raids, according to a recent Pew poll. More videos of parents being torn away from their children, or ICE agents arresting American citizens for being Hispanic, won’t play well. Nor should they: this is not the view of America that most Americans want to see. And it’s counterproductive.A Long and Fraught Dependency on Immigrant LaborThe conflicted relationship with immigrants, who we have always relied on to do the actual work of building the nation and the economy, actually predates the nation. You can trace it all the way back to Peter Stuyvesant and New Amsterdam in the 17th century. Stuyvesant, the director general of New Amsterdam, initially resisted some non-Dutch immigrants but lost that battle to the practical priorities of developing New Amsterdam as a global trading hub. (Which, to be clear, included the slave trade.)Our tortured history with new arrivals vacillates between exploitation and demonization, as befits the times and the politicians. The No Nothings, or “American” party, of the 1850s were anti-Catholic—and thus by definition anti-immigrant. The Chinese Exclusion Act of 1882 and the Gentleman’s Agreement of 1907 discriminated against Chinese and Japanese emigrants. Yet the exploitation of immigrant labor proved to be one of America’s great bargains: workers accepted low wages and sometimes brutal conditions because the U.S. did indeed promise far more opportunity than did their native countries. Immigrants labored in the steel mills of Pittsburgh (those of Slavic origin were referred to generically as “hunkies”), in the brass works in Connecticut, the thread mills in Massachusetts, the meatpacking plants in Chicago, the auto plants in Detroit,  and the coal mines in Pennsylvania, Kentucky and West Virginia. And on farms from Minnesota to Louisiana, New Jersey to California.  New York City, where 40% of the population is foreign-born, could not thrive without immigrants, and that’s been true of most big U.S. cities for the last two centuries. (My family arrived in New York’s teeming Little Italy from Naples in the late 19th century.)Within this pool of immigrants was a steady stream of entrepreneurs such as Amadeo Pietro Giannini,  who founded the Bank of Italy in San Francisco in the aftermath of the Great Earthquake. You may know that institution by its current name: Bank of America. Or Adolphus Busch and Eberhard Anheuser, Germans who formed what would become the great American beer company, Anheuser-Busch. Later came Andy Grove, the Hungarian co-founder of Intel; and Google’s co-founder, the Russian born Sergey Brin. And yes, the South Africa via Canada émigré Elon Musk, whose auto company is named after the astonishing Serbian immigrant Nicola Tesla, whose own genius paved the way for the electric grid that powers the device you are using to read these words.Why America Needs Immigrants to Fuel Its Future EconomyToday, from a demographic perspective, the U.S. cannot achieve significant economic growth unless it increases the supply of people. GDP growth is proportional to population growth and population growth has declined from 1% in 2000 to 0.5% in 2025 and is projected to fall further. The current birthrate is at a record low. The demographics also tell us that the ratio of older people to the working-age population is expanding. We can’t solve the coming Social Security insolvency unless there are more working-age people. People who weren’t necessarily born here.Immigrants help solve those demographic issues: they’re younger, have a higher birthrate than citizens, and are clearly willing to work and contribute to their communities. And while Congress debates the deficit, immigrants—legal or not—are paying taxes and contributing to Social Security. In fact, in 2023, households led by undocumented immigrants alone paid nearly $90 billion in taxes, according to the  American Immigration Council. Meanwhile, the median pay of immigrants was about 16% below native-born Americans in 2024, according to the Bureau of Labor Statistics. That’s known as value for money.And immigrants are not the people that Trump and his anti-immigration extremist Stephen Miller have so viciously characterized. Immigrants are less likely than American citizens to commit a crime. Despite claims that they suck up state and federal resources, their labor participation rate is higher than Americans. Immigrants, in fact, are more likely to start a business and create jobs. They are more likely to build your house or pick your vegetables. Or take care of your children or your aging parents. The greatest danger most Americans face from an immigrant is if you got hit by one who fell of your roof while repairing it.While we need more special people like Steve Jobs, whose father was a Syrian immigrant, the greater demand is for people willing to fill the everyday jobs that make the economy go. What we currently lack, though, is better a path to citizenship, a middle way that balances the nation’s requirements against the overwhelming desire of non-Americans to get here. Yet bipartisan efforts in Congress to reform immigration law has repeatedly collapsed, at least partly because conservatives have found it to be such a powerful wedge issue.The economic and social cost of the current immigration crackdown is going to become even more visible in the coming months. Summer is prime time for industries that rely on immigrants. Corn and tomatoes, peaches and peas, and plumbs and cherries have to be harvested nationwide. Hotels and resorts require staff to take care of vacationers. And at many rural hospitals, the July inflow of residents and medical students relies heavily on foreigners. This is also prime time for homebuilding, and we’re short of new homes. But the White House has created a double whammy that’s likely to make homes more expensive and less available by reducing the labor pool and increasing the cost of materials through tariffs.Meanwhile, there are 7.4 million job openings as of April, according to the Jolts data from BLS. As for all those manufacturing jobs Trumps thinks he can reshore, he might want to inquire whether anyone wants them. Manufacturers are currently short 400,000 workers.That doesn’t sound like a winning proposition; nor is our current immigration policy.  With his poll numbers declining across the board, it’s quite likely that Trump could soften his anti-immigrant stance and the ICE raids. Whatever Americans may think of the crackdown as social policy, if the economy weakens (which looks to be the case), we will once again realize that as an economic policy, xenophobia is a loser.Bill Saporito is a veteran business journalist whose work has appeared in the New York Times and Washington Post. Previously, he worked as an editor at large at Inc. magazine, an assistant managing editor at Time, and as a senior editor at Fortune. He has written for From Day One on the power gap among labor unions, the myth of the “woke” corporation, and the perils of getting technology and people misaligned.(Featured photo: Seasonal immigrants picking strawberries near Salinas, Calif. Photo by rightdx/iStock by Getty Images)

Story cover image
Feature BY Emily McCrary-Ruiz-Esparza | June 20, 2025

The Quiet Excellence Among Federal Workers—and What Corporate Leaders Could Learn From Them

The employees at NASA’s Jet Propulsion Laboratory are among the most high-performing teams on earth. They explore the farthest edges of galaxies, photograph cosmic events millions of years old, dream up some of the most advanced technology humans have ever made—and build vehicles to go where no one has gone before.More milestones are on the way. In 2027, the JPL will launch into space the Nancy Grace Roman Space Telescope—the most sophisticated to date—and, as the writer Dave Eggers puts it, they’re “within striking distance” of identifying not just the existence but also the location of life elsewhere in the universeThis is a world-changing pursuit for everyone born on terra firma, yet most of the folks at JPL don’t seek praise for what they do. When the writer Dave Eggers visited the lab in Pasadena, Calif., to write about its workers for the Washington Post, he noted that “no one at JPL—no one I met, at least—was willing to take credit for anything.”This work ethic, too, is worth some deep exploring. How can people making history by their excellence shun conventional appreciation? Corporate leaders in HR insist that a culture of recognition is essential to a healthy and productive workforce. True enough, yet Eggers found more dimensions of worker satisfaction that many corporate employers could learn from. Among them: an embrace of intrinsic motivation (curiosity and collaboration) rather than only extrinsic forms (compensation and celebrity); the challenges of answering big questions and solving societal problems; and the sense of leaving a generational legacy.“Yes, we are in the space business and in the knowledge business,” one manager told Eggers, “but I’ve always believed that we’re really in the inspiration business, the inspiration that we have lent out and inspired generations of engineers and scientists. It cannot be underestimated.”What’s even more remarkable, writers like Eggers have discovered: the JPL isn’t an outlier. It’s not an exotic planet among federal agencies, but representative of similar values across the workforce of 2.4 million civilian federal workers.At a time when the Trump administration has cut almost 59,000 federal employees and given buyouts to 76,000 as of mid-May, all the while vilifying the federal workforce as lazy and low-performing, a cadre of journalists have taken a closer look at who does the work that makes the U.S. government, and the country, run. The author Michael Lewis got curious about this at the dawn of the first Trump administration, when the incoming president and his team decided to skip the traditional briefing given by the previous administration on the complexities of the executive workforce. Lewis’s reporting produced a series of Washington Post stories and a bestselling book, The Fifth Risk, which explored what happens when the government is controlled by people who have little idea of how itworks.As a follow-up in 2024, Lewis and six colleagues, who include Eggers, the comic W. Kamau Bell, and Pulitzer Prize winner Geraldine Brooks, followed federal employees as they hammered through their day-to-day duties. The often-arcane pursuits included engineering structures that save miners from dying on the job, investigating cybercrime (and nabbing the criminals), burying and memorializing veterans, meticulously calculating the health of our economy, protecting our most treasured national relics, dispensing knowledge to the public, busting monopolies with verve.The series of profiles, called “Who Is Government?,” ran in installments in the Washington Post in 2024 and was published this year as a book by the same name, now a bestseller.Lewis and his co-authors describe a culture within the federal workforce that most business leaders, and HR teams, might only dream of: a high regard for management, routinely doing more with less, a painstaking commitment to measurement, high retention despite comparatively low pay, creativity and innovation with slim budgets, and a deep personal commitment to the cause of the organization. But there’s still that missing piece—no one’s singling them out for praise.One former assistant secretary of foreign affairs at the Veterans Administration tells writer Casey Cep, without apparent resentment, that to be a civil servant is to be invisible. “No one ever knows about the good you do.” What, then, takes the place of that?How Corporate America Is Different, But Could ChangeCorporate America tends to mingle with its own kind. Private-sector conferences seldom invite public-sector speakers, there are few federal bureaucratic influencers on LinkedIn, Fortune isn’t likely to profile cybercrime teams at the IRS, even though they’ve recovered billions of dollars for the American public.Yet, in many ways, the public sector has achieved what the private sector still grapples for.If anyone in the private sector knows about excellence, it’s Lawrence Price. He’s a West Point graduate, an Army veteran, and the holder of a Ph.D. in industrial and organizational psychology. In the private sector he has worn titles like “director of organizational development and continuous improvement” and “vice president of organizational excellence.” He’s currently the VP of people and culture at Brink’s, the company whose armored trucks transport wads of cash and diamonds.There are three types of corporate excellence, he said. Efficiency, innovation, and proficiency. The federal workforce, which is so large and so diverse in its purposes, contains all three.Companies that create the same product or service repeatedly want to be efficient. Bereaved families can call the National Cemetery Administration (part of the VA) most times of day or night to make funeral arrangements. Though every military member who dies is unique in their way, their burials are democratically the same: Republican and Democrat, male and female, black and white, officer or enlisted. It’s worth noting that they have so mastered efficiency with strict process and deep respect that the NCA ranks above any organization—public or private—on the American Consumer Satisfaction Index.Those that make new things want to be innovative (and are seldom concerned with efficiency). It makes sense that the JPL satisfies this criteria, but, as Sarah Vowell’s story in Who Is Government? shows, so does the Food and Drug Administration, whose CURE ID website allows doctors all over the world to report cases of rare disease and log the treatments that work and don’t work. It’s the first of its kind. And they did it on a shoestring.Companies that gather groups of experts—like a hospital or a robotics firm, for instance—want to be proficient. Most federal departments are proficiency hubs in one fashion or another. IRS cybercrime investigators are experts in digital forensics, archivists are experts in preservation and knowledge dissemination, the Department of Justice’s antitrust division is a concentration of experts in monopolies and mitigating them.All companies want some level of financial sustainability, Price noted. The same is true for government agencies, which need to meet their budgets even as they make difficult decisions between competing programs, dreams, and expectations.And all organizations want engaged employees, a goal easier for those that prize proficiency and harder for those that prize efficiency, but not impossible. Casey Cep writes that the private sector could learn a thing or two from the National Cemetery Administration, especially in the way of commitment. “There is no mission more sacred than honoring these heroes and helping their families through such a hard time, and it’s a job that [the NCA does] with excellence and compassion every single day,” Denis McDonough, the former secretary of Veterans Affairs, told Cep.Price believes that intrinsic motivation and sense of duty–a feeling that it’s a privilege to serve–are far more powerful than what corporate America might call a culture of recognition. “It’s stickier,” he said. “I’m ex-military, and it’s amazing to me what a piece of tin going on a person’s uniform—how it will motivate them, how it makes them feel seen.”Finding Motivation in the Mission It’s easy to imagine self-generating motivation if your mission is to support and defend the Constitution of the United States–an oath sworn by both military and civil servants. But what if you make windshield wipers, or build software, or paint houses? Where–and how–will employees find motivation?It may be a matter of identifying the human dignity in what the company does. Adam Weber, an executive coach in the private sector, told From Day One that organizational excellence begins with a clear vision for the future: “That flag on the moon, that deep understanding of why the business exists and where it’s headed,” he said. This needn’t be some altruistic dream nor a sappy myth about changing the world, but a clear-eyed description of the effects of what your employees do.A commercial painting business beautifies homes simply and efficiently. A sportswear brand helps keep people active and healthy. A payments software company helps people get paid on time. And a cybersecurity company ensures those paychecks stay in the accounts where they belong.The federal employees profiled in Who Is Government? are acutely aware of the downstream effects of their work, and they’re aware of who’s footing the bill. “The scientists I met [at JPL] were exquisitely aware that they’re spending taxpayer money, and they were determined to justify the faith put in them,” Eggers wrote. The sense of dignity in their work is immensely high. In corporate speak: They’re engaged with the company mission, and accountable to their stakeholders.Even so, long before the Trump administration declared open season on federal workers, their advocates decided that they could use a little more limelight in their own interest. Each year since 2002, the Partnership for Public Services gives out what’s called the Oscars of their field. At the award ceremony this week, the top price went to David Lebryk, a former top Treasury Department who “was forced out of his career position for refusing to grant Elon Musk and his Department of Government Efficiency what he considered unlawful access to the government’s payment system,” as the New York Times reported.In accepting his award, Lebryk noted that “most of my career was spent trying to be unnoticed.” But now he was in the spotlight and wanted to encourage his successors. The night before the awards, he addressed a group of incoming federal interns, encouraging them to pursue public service, the Times reported. Eventually, he said, “things will break,” and the administration “will have to turn to people who know how to fix things.” He said he tells government colleagues to “take care of yourself, and take the long view; your skills are going to be needed in the future.”Emily McCrary-Ruiz-Esparza is an independent journalist and From Day One contributing editor who writes about business and the world of work. Her work has appeared in the Economist, the BBC, The Washington Post, Inc., and Business Insider, among others. She is the recipient of a Virginia Press Association award for business and financial journalism.(Featured photo: a portrait of employees at the Jet Propulsion Laboratory, from left, Tiffany Kataria, Bertrand Mennesson, Vanessa Bailey, and Kim Aaron. Photo ©Jay L. Clendenin)

Story cover image